August 29, 2011
Christie Blatchford: Warrior of the “rigid boundary of Canadian conversation”

With all the publicity surrounding the death of Jack Layton, someone Christie Blatchfordwas bound to ruffle feathers.

And just as the news hit the far reaches of our land, there it was – a column that would later be described as terse, cold, insensitive and tasteless. The writer would be called a troll (among other things) and her life would be threatened. She was even compared to Darth Vader.

Numerous web sites came alive with outrage almost as fast as the original news. On Twitter alone, her name was trending quickly, just below the name of her subject. Readers were aghast and shocked.

But come on. Why the surprise? What else do you expect from Christie Blatchford? Telling us what we don’t want to hear is her calling card.

The National Post columnist has made a career out of the ugly side of things. She has covered the grittiest, most unpleasant stories in Canadian history. Paul Bernardo. Robert Pickton. War in Afghanistan. Native occupation in Caledonia. Russell Williams. And she spared no details. Thousands, if not millions of her written words on these stories have made our collective stomach turn. It should be no surprise when Blatchford points out a different angle to the story.

Now the collective dust has settled and the tears are dried, we need to take the emotional away and really read what Blatch wrote in the now infamous Aug. 22 column.

The central theme to the column, as indicated in the headline, “Layton’s death turns into a thoroughly public spectacle,” is her prediction the response to the death of such a man would be as public as he lived.

After Layton’s adult life was spent in the spotlight, she indicates, “how fitting that his death should be turned into such a public spectacle.” And well, in the end, it was. She was right. Hoards of mourners in Ottawa and Toronto. Emotional chalk messages. A countless-man procession. Gripping eulogies. Haunting (and surprising) music. Events in the week following his death would be very reflective of the man Layton was - “a 24/7 politician who was always on.” No where did she say he was undeserving. 

Perhaps the biggest offense was the word “spectacle.” That is where she lost her readers from the get go in the headline. There would be little mention of Blatchford’s description of Layton as brave, likeable, agreeable, who “made an enormous contribution to his party and a significant one to Canada.”

Did she call Layton vainglorious? Yeah. But this was the man who once marched Toronto Pride in chaps. His speeches burned with patriotism and pride. Even his party’s colour is rather loud. It was Layton’s vainglorious nature that made him the successful leader he was. The follow up ugly word to “spectacle,” may be an applicable one.

Tweet about BlatchfordReally the strongest words were left for her peers who, in a profession supposedly marked by lack of bias, at times took things a little more personal in their commentary. And still, a week later, few have responded to that.

Let’s stop and think about this mess. Is it too hasty to assume we got in a tizzy a little too quick? A few messages of support have gone as far as to say we have already forgotten Layton’s parting message that love is better than anger. It’s ok. We were grieving.

But now it is over and Blatchford should be given props for demonstrating a writer’s bravery. She threw out an idea when we were at our weakest and we failed to digest it even when in the end, her points proved to be very true in the events following Layton’s untimely death. Just as she indicates she is, “no stranger to the rigid boundaries of Canadian public conversation,” Christie Blatchford is a warrior woman.

August 23, 2011
Layton kept future for Toronto on national agenda

Jack Layton

The Canadian Press got it right when they said the death of Jack Layton leaves a gaping hole in the Canadian political landscape.

Layton’s leadership brought the New Democrat Party to incredible heights. They rallied never before seen support in Quebec. They regained trust in Ontario after unsettling provincial leadership in the early-90s. Years of Layton’s leadership would culminate with forming an official minority government after the 2011 federal election. He found the dream of the parties founding leader, Tommy Douglas, to bring the party to the forefront of the government of Canada.

But what CP and many other news outlets have omitted is that the loss is even more personal for Toronto. He was one of our own. 

Layton was a staple of the community. More than a representative for a large federal riding, he shared and pushed values tied to our cities largest problems and biggest dreams. Homelessness. Social equality. Environmental awareness. Even the now controversial rights for cyclists. Much of his work kept issues key to the heartbeat of Toronto on the national agenda.

He built the majority of his life in Hogtown. Although born in Quebec, he lived in here since 1970. He would get his graduate degree at York, teach at Ryerson and eventually earn his first representative seat with an election to Toronto City Council in 1982.

Layton would jump to federal politics two decades later and take the leadership of the NDP in January 2003 with 53.5 percent of the vote.

He would later marry Olivia Chow another Torontonian and city councilor, who also made the jump to federal politics and became elected representative for Trinity-Spadina. Together they manned two high profile Toronto ridings that accounted for over 219,000 people.

Memorial Wall at Nathan Phillips Square in Toronto

In between their political work, Layton and Chow were active in the city. They could be seen shopping in Chinatown, catching the Stanley Cup final at Gretzky’s, skating at city hall and marching in the annual Toronto Pride parade.

In an era where appreciation for our mayor ebbs, the city still had one man on its side. Yesterday he would be mourned from Lakeshore to Steeles.

As news of his passing spread, hundreds gathered for an impromptu memorial at Nathan Phillips Square. A condolence book was set up. Signs were displayed. Candles lit. Memories shared. Crowds would eventually chant a quote from Layton’s final letter: “Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. We’ll carry your dream. The change begins here.”

Further moving was the gesture of leaving memorial messages to Layton on the cement walls and ground around the square. Space filled up rapidly with simple, spiritual and encouraging messages, all in pretty pastel chalk. 

Jack Layton RIP. Thank you for standing up for us. We will miss you.

By nightfall space was covered and Torontonians ambled through well into the night reading the messages as a Canadian flag flew still at half-mast above the scene.

Hamlet inscription at Layton Memorial

I visited last night and spent a long time reading the carefully inscribed messages. People were still taking pictures. One couple embraced and quietly cried. As I left, walking east from the Square to Bay Street, I spotted a 
final inscribed message that was particularly moving. It was a quote from Hamlet, who like Layton, was charged with duty and dedicated his life to fight for justice.

“Now cracks a noble heart,” it read. “Goodnight, sweet prince; and flights of angels sing thee to thy rest.”

August 14, 2011
Barney’s version brilliant, hilarious portrait of impossible man

Mordecai Richler was once considered one of the greatest shining stars of his literary generation. 

The author, essayist, journalist and screenwriter was known for his controversial opinions on contemporary Canadian politics and culture. He often wrote with biting wit and sharp satire. With the release of his book, “Barney’s Version,” Richler was called “a novelist at the top of his game,” by the Wall Street Journal. MacLean’s magazine said the book was “a feast of non-stop storytelling and arguably Richler’s funniest book yet.”

“Barney’s Version,” is the autobiography of fictional character Barney Panofsky, a flamboyant, perverted and stubborn Montreal producer who believes no one can get along and that life is completely absurd. He is proven somewhat right when his sworn enemy accuses him of abuse, fraud and murder. The story unfolds with Barney recalling his life, three marriages, and the disappearance of the friend whose murder he is charged with.

On the surface Barney is an impossible individual, but his story unfolds to be one of to demonstrate the power of love and family, the frightening process of aging and one’s own death. Barney Panofsky is very much a worthwhile individual not far from you or I. It is a story anyone can relate to and a very good read. The Montreal Gazette referred to it best in saying that “Barney’s Version,” is, “by turns gripping, hilarious, ridiculous and poignant.”

The book would become the winner of the Giller Prize, the Stephen Leacock Award for Humour and the Commonwealth Writer’s Prize for Best Book. It was also a 2004 Canada Read’s selection.

Ten years after Mordecai Richler’s death, and 13 years after the book’s original release, “Barney’s Version,” is making a comback. A film version premiered at the 2010 Toronto International Film Festival to rave reviews. A preview of that film is available here.

August 14, 2011
Tales of a barista

When I get my morning coffee every morning, I get the biggest smile on my face.

It’s not just its rich aroma and the sweet, creamy taste. It’s because I know exactly what’s gone into it.

Besides the pumps of syrup, steamed non-fat milk and a dollop of foam, there is the blood, sweat and tears of the barista who made it.

I say this from experience. I spent four years as a barista for a major coffee conglomerate.

It was exhausting work. Long lines. Demanding customers all with a made-to-order beverage. Hundreds (maybe thousands) of recipes. Pitchers and pitchers of five kinds of milk. Spills. And so much more.

And I loved every minute of it. My years making lattes and recommending pastry were some of the most joyful and enriching of my life.

I learned some pretty interesting information, like the roasting process of a coffee bean, how to steam a 2-litre pitcher of milk perfectly and how to calibrate a machine for the best shot of espresso.

But I also learned about people. I learned about connecting, interacting and engaging. And that has served me every day since I was hired there.

I had never planned to get a job serving coffee. I was in university and in desperate need of a summer job when met someone at a party who said she would refer me. I put in my application, was hired two weeks later and before I knew it, I had a thick training manual and 10-shift training plan.

My first store was very big and very busy. Over two weeks different managers, coaches and trainers worked with me to show me the ropes amid the line ups of customers. We brewed coffee in a French press, conducted tastings, pulled shots of espresso, learned about adding the right amount of pumps of syrup into four sizes of cups and set up the pastry case full of delicious goodies.

At night after work I would collapse into bed exhausted and exhilarated. My eyes twitched after all the caffeine. But I didn’t care.

The big test came on my first solo shift. I was excited. I put on a dress shirt and tie, donned a crisp, clean apron, affixed a shiny new, “Certified Barista” pin and headed for the bar.

It was a Friday night and the evening was alive. My store was in a busy shopping plaza and dozens were milling about, lining up for drinks in between grocery shopping, heading to the movies or jumping on the highway to get out of town for the weekend.

My job was simple. Steam 2-litre pitchers of 2 percent and non-fat milk for the continuous line up of drinks.

I would do this for four straight hours. My friend Leah worked next to me – stopping at intervals to adjustmy practices, making sure I got the best foam. And together we chatted with thecustomers as they waited.

The shift had been great fun. When it was over, my shirt and tie were covered in splashes of milk and syrup. My shoes were sticky. I smelled of coffee. But I still loved it and couldn’t wait for the next day.

As the weeks went on I mastered the once complicated drink menu. I steamed great milk and pulled great shots. I made countless presses for perfect pairings. And after a few Friday nights, I could master the bar alone – steaming two pitchers at once, shots pulling, blenders going all while making a cappuccino with the “perfect pour.”

I felt like Tom Cruise in Cocktail. I was disappointed my supervisors wouldn’t let me twirl cups and bottles of syrup in the air as I worked.

But very quickly I came to see that the best part was the people. I met wonderful people as I made those drinks.

There was a dizzying array of multicultural, socioeconomic, spiritual, interesting and sometimes strange people to serve everyday, all giving you a few minutes and a few dollars in exchange for a cup of coffee.

Customers, and what brought them there, was diverse. There were business people on the way to meetings. Moms on the go. College students holding a study group. Actors working on location. First dates. Last dates. The after church fellowship group. The running group crowd.

Looking out into the café revealed an interesting bevy of activity. Meetings were held. Artists created. Moms breast fed. People played cards and board games. Couples snuggled.

Part of the fun became referring to people by their drink.

“Grande Green Tea, how are you doing today,” I’d say. And with a smile he would go off about his wonderful girlfriend, the eventual engagement, marriage and setting up their first house.

There was Doppio Espresso in every Sunday morning. He’d welcome dozens of guests and when he’d leave, he’d pick up the cheque for most of them and leave a good tip.

Grande Lactaid with Cinnamon Chai was in many days through her maternity leave. Her son had been born very premature and every visit she’d update us with his progress.

I eventually took breaks with her and she let me snuggle her wee baby while she’d tell me stories of her mother in the Virgin Islands, her steel drum band, her job as a teacher and different ideas for inventions she’d have.

I learned a lot from that customer. I’m sure others did as well. She’s just one of many over four years who came in for coffee and gave so much more in return.

After four years, I quit my job at the coffee shop. The company had changed and so had I. But I was very grateful and carry the memories to this day.

In theory, it was all just coffee. But the experience was so much more. I learned some unique skills. I met so many people and had the opportunity to add a little something to their day.

And they gave something to mine, every day, for the four years I worked there. And they will continue to come to mind every morning, putting a smile on my face, when I have my Grande, Half Sweet, Soy, No Water, 140 degree, Extra Foamy Chai Latte.

10:20am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZcnGSx8IwMZa
Filed under: Canada Coffee 
August 14, 2011
Gibson fiction work fueled by own madness “like an open vein”

Margaret Gibson was so obsessed with words she would write until her fingers bled. 

Literally and figuratively, her blood, sweat and tears went into her work.

Diagnosed a paranoid schizophrenic as a teenager, it was her therapist who encouraged her to write. And she did. Obsessively. She would go on to pen books of poems, short stories and the screenplay for the cult film “Outrageous,” before she released her first novel, “Opium Dreams,” in 1997.

Gibson’s work was seemingly fiction. But she admittedly wrote heavily on her life, including time spent in a mental institution, a failed marriage, suicide attempts and psychotic episodes to time with her quirky friends and mothering her son. She saw the relationship between art and life as one and the same, saying in an interview, “Art is a distillation of life. Life is mirrored in art. If it is good art, then it is a clearly reflecting mirror.”

“Opium Dreams” is the story of Maggie Glass whose father is suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease. Over a period of years she must watch her father deteriorate, as she comes to grips with his life, their strained relationship and her own battle with psychological illness and epilepsy.

The story sways back and forth between Margaret’s perspective and her father’s unconscious visions of his life, including horrific experiences serving as a tailgunner in World War II, marrying, buildling a home and nurturing a family in Ontario.

Gibson masterfully crafts two complex and complicated characters who are intertwined by chronic illness, united by the deep love and understanding of parent and child.

In a later interview, Gibson describes “Opium Dreams,” as “the most autobiographical book I’ve ever written… It’s like Joan Didion says: “Play it as it lays,” and I do.”

Her publishers recognized this unique style, with Barry Callaghan from Exile Editions saying, “all writers write out of their experiences, but [Gibson] was like an open vein.”

“Opium Dreams,” is an incredible piece of work for understanding complicated relationships, chronic illness and the writer’s own complicated life.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »